India’s No.1 Corporate Social Responsibility Magazine since 2013 | RNI No. DELENG/2013/49640



Ashoka University’s new study reveals India’s position w.r.t relationship between tax incentives and philanthropic giving


New Delhi, 24th December, 2021: The Centre for Social Impact and Philanthropy (CSIP), Ashoka University, and Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA) have conducted a study on the relationship between tax incentives and philanthropic giving. The study compares India’s incentive policy with that of 11 countries, namely Bangladesh, Brazil, China, France, Mexico, Norway, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, UK and US, selected for the diversity of their economic status and models.

India falls somewhere in the middle because the rate of incentives offered has declined due to tax policy changes of 2017 and the introduction of a ‘dual tax structure’ in 2020. Lower personal income tax rates and the abolition of inheritance and wealth taxes have further reduced the attractiveness of tax incentives for philanthropy.

Governments across the world support the nonprofit sector through various measures. One of the most common and visible of these are tax incentives on charitable donations made by individuals and corporates. Of the countries studied, France, Singapore, and the UK have the most generous tax incentive structures, while Bangladesh, Brazil and Mexico fall at the other end of the spectrum. France, rates highly because its incentives take the form of tax credit, whereas for Singapore, it is the high rates of both, incentive and ceiling, and in the case of the UK, it is the combination of tax rate, form and the rate of incentive. Bangladesh’s low rate of incentive and Brazil’s and Mexico’s, low deduction ceilings determine their lower ratings.

The study finds that, taking other factors such as the culture of giving, level of economic development, and individual personality into account, incentives do impact the ‘cost of giving’. Some of the broad findings are:

  • Increase in tax incentives (i.e., a decline in the price of giving) leads to an increase in charitable donation
  • Influence of tax incentives for charitable donations is found to be higher for the higher-income groups as opposed to average tax payers
  • Eligibility of a large number of causes for tax incentives can have a positive influence on donations
  • Even when tax incentives are not a deciding factor in motivating charitable donations, they have a signaling effect, which can positively influence donations
  • Absence of taxes that affect the wealthy relatively more, such as wealth tax and inheritance tax, weakens the influence of incentives on donation

Speaking about the study, Subrat Das, Executive Director, Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA) said, “Given the persistent challenges of inequality and the uneven post-pandemic recovery, India needs a quantum increase in domestic philanthropic funding directed towards upliftment of the most marginalized; the latter will depend on the extent to which our tax system and regulatory framework are made more enabling for civil society interventions.”

Considering the enormous role that the non-profit sector plays in India and the impact of Government policies in promoting the concept of ‘Giving’, the study gives the following recommendations:

  • Rigorous studies for evidence-based policy making
  • Improving tax data availability
  • Increasing tax exemptions on ‘giving’
  • Reintroduction of certain taxes for HIGs

Speaking about the study and importance of data availability, Ingrid Srinath, Director CSIP said, “The data across development goals are clear. India has enormous gaps in our achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that have been further exacerbated by COVID-19. A serious re-examination of our tax incentive regime could not be more urgently required. Even just making data more accessible could unleash a flood of generosity from Indians across the country.”

Besides identifying the kinds of tax incentives provided for charitable donations by these 11 countries, the study also assesses what evidence exists for the effectiveness of tax incentives in influencing charitable donations. It also makes policy recommendations to strengthen the non-profit sector, a sector that complements the provisioning of public goods and services provided by the government among other roles.

The study hopes to facilitate de-mystifying the linkages between tax incentives and philanthropic giving; to map the different approaches adopted by countries for providing tax incentives for charitable donation and provide, at one place, evidence of the effectiveness of tax incentives on donations, or the lack of it – both equally important from the perspective of policy making.




Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this section and articles contributed are those of the respective authors, who have submitted it as their original work. They do not reflect the opinions or views of CSR Times, or its employees, management and group publications. The accuracy and reliability of information presented has not been verified by CSR Times. CSR Times will not be held responsible in any way for the content of this article.






Scroll to Top
Logo 11th Summit


Yes, I'd like to celebrate excellence in Corporate Social Responsibility by engaging with top minds to gain insights, and be recognized for our impactful CSR intiative.